“Councillors bid to crack down on anti-social behaviour”‏

Regarding the front page headline of Dinnington Guardian, Fri 4th November,
“Maltby: ‘Booze Free Zone’ “.
The story on page 2 headlined “Council wants Maltby booze ban” has a less than flattering photo of Bullseye and the boarded up shop on the opposite corner and goes on to report that Rotherham councillors have agreed to introduce a Designated Public Place Order in Maltby.

http://http://www.dinningtontoday.co.uk/news/local-news/council_wants_maltby_booze_ban_1_3949226

It states that
“Maltby town councillor Keith Stringer welcomed an introduction of a DPPO order in the town” and that the report will go before the licensing board for consideration on Wednesday 16th November.
In the light of this, I have the following questions :
Has this been discussed with Maltby Town Council and if so when ?
Which areas or land have been identified as being affected and by whom ?
If the board agree to introduce a DPPO how would the statutory consultation be implemented ?
If Maltby Town Council is paying Maltby News to report MTC issues, why is an item of such importance as this not reported in it but only reported in The Dinnington Guardian, a paid for newspaper?

Now then, who would like to be the first to give an answer … MTC Councillor K Stringer ? MTC Councillors and RMBC Councillors A Rushton, C Beaumont J Andrews ? Kevin Hall and Maltby News ? or A N Other ?
(all responses treated with the strictest of confidence… )

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s