Our MP seems to think that having 16 and 17 year olds able to vote would
“ensure politicians in Westminster listen to young people and their concerns.”
Not sure how that works. He doesn’t listen to what his constituents aged 18 plus have to say, so good luck kids on that one !
I understand that the concept of civic duty is based on the principle that citizens owe some allegiance to their government and that government in turn protects its citizens. Maybe when our MP gives us some reason to show allegiance to him and his fellow party members we might be more inclined to expect our children to do their “duty”.
“I would like to see legislation to ensure that youngsters aged 16 and 17 will be able to vote at general and local elections.
At the last general election, only 44% of those aged 18-24 voted. Offering votes to people aged 16 would create a generation of politically active citizens, through empowering youngsters with the vote, coupled with strengthened citizenship education. Over time, voting would become a rite of passage in our education system.
In Scotland, 16 and 17 year olds have secured the right to vote in the 2014 independence referendum, whilst in 2012 the Welsh Assembly voted to support lowering the voting age to 16.
Changing the voting age would be an important way to ensure our youngsters have a better sense of their civic duties, but also to ensure politicians in Westminster listen to young people and their concerns.”
Corrupt as corrupt can be!! Give the vote to those who are not mature, not held responsible and not capable of withstanding the pressure of coercion. That’s right! You are transparent, Mr Barron. Have you had a mental health check-
up yourself recently?
What about Kevin fighting for legal binding referendums and a vote on Europe. But Kevin knows little about democracy, he thinks he and the other 650 know better than the 40 million plus who can vote in this country.